Talk:Francis Marrash/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by GreatOrangePumpkin in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    "His poetry also had lasting influence on the Mahjaris.[8] " - had a lasting influence
    The lead should generally not contain any references, see WP:LEADCITE
    Link humanistic
    In the first paragraph of Literary career, there are several chaotic errors beginning with equality among peoples
    Link Lebanese
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    The picture could be increased in size
  7. Overall: Hold very nice article. Glad to learn more about Syrian literature. Regards.--Kürbis () 12:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
    Pass/Fail: