Talk:Fossil trade

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

fossil trade page edit

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

looks like the people who think they own this site are determined to paint the fossil trade in a negative light. Oddly, it also appears the same people know very little about the fossil trade except what they have read in magazines. Also, here in the usa, we have a deeply corrupt federal government that seizes private property without any payment and then, with fanfare, gives the fossils back to other countries. Two years later some of those fossils are back in (different) private hands. But some here want to highlight the work of our government.

The private fossil trade has put a lot of fossils into public collections overtime. The owners of this site are openly biased and they don't care that they are biased. I know they raise excellent points against the fossil trade, but TFT is not all bad. Change my mind. 166.182.82.134 (talk) 03:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic