Talk:Fort Battleford

Untitled

Does "it also offered an alterative means of tranportation to the Red River Cart" mean that using the river was an option to hauling things via a Red River Ox Cart? If so, you might want to clarify that in the sentence and we can link to Red River Cart. --Habap 13:57, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ah, okay. I'm still in the process of adding stuff to the article - mostly historical stuff. Hrm - information on the fort as it is now (National Historic Site, right) should be addressed - but before or after the history? --204.83.179.218 00:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) I'm afraid I don't have the time to contribute anything more to this article; suggest it be fast-tracked. --Kelvin Palm 04:11, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Infobox

There is a choice between using Infobox Military Structure and Template:Infobox Protected area Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 04:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as stub

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Battleford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091021102620/http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=3ceddf25-86ef-4433-86ea-cfe3cc69472d to http://www.gov.sk.ca/news?newsId=3ceddf25-86ef-4433-86ea-cfe3cc69472d

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)