This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
i think this article is quite biased
it does not mention the UN troops withdrawal during the genocide —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.140.85.163 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 21 November 2006
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Amazing! This article consists of an almost completely unsourced lede, with sentences written in 2002, unaltered, then one section (bilateral relations) consisting of a list of colourful flags and obligatory refs of diplomatic missions, which about 20 people a day look at. Wuerzele (talk) 07:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
