Talk:For the Win

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For the Win edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"For The Win." FTW, An enthusiastic emphasis to the end of a comment, message, or post. Sometimes genuine, but often sarcastic. Originated from the game show Hollywood Squares where the result of the player's response is expected to win the game. Source: Urbandictionary.com

This should be the main meaning in this article I think, but because it is regarded as vandalism to add it and move the current content to an article about the novel, I tried to create the article For the win (saying) instead. However, the article creating wizard is broken.

83.250.32.20 (talk) 10:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Expansion? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

I find the length of this article paltry and was wondering if anyone would be willing to add to it. I don't think I have the writing skills nor the wikipedia expertise to finish it, but could post a longer summary to be revised. GeneralRobotwallah (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Currently reading the book, and I think at least a plot summary would be very nice. I can write one when I'm finished, if no one else is planning to do that at the moment. Daniel kraft (talk) 13:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sounds great, I'll add anything missed and generally help, put it up whenever. GeneralRobotwallah (talk) 19:45, 22 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I've put online a summary of the first part of the book; I'll work on the other two parts over the next days, hopefully. Feel free (of course) to change the text if you have any ideas for improvement (or let me know your ideas and I'll change it accordingly). The plot seems rather convoluted to me, so I hope I got (and will get) it right. Domob (talk) 20:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

And now part 2. Hopefully, I can complete the plot summary over the next week or so, adding part 3. Domob (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Finally completed the plot summary. And it seems that the frst two parts are already reviewed (or how that's called on Wikipedia). I'd welcome comments and improvements on the summary where applicable! Domob (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic