Talk:Florida State Road 24

Merge proposal

According to [1] and the article, SR 226 is entirely concurrent with SR 24A. As such, there's no reason for the two routes to have separate articles (or in this case, separate coverage). – TMF 16:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Weak oppose - SR 24A is also concurrent with SR 331 between SR 226 and SR 20/24/26. ----DanTD (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

So what? I'm not calling for SR 24A to be merged into SR 226; I'm calling for 226 to be merged into 24A. – TMF 16:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

If so, the continuation of SR 24A onto SR 331 should be noted anyhow. ----DanTD (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

That has nothing to do with whether or not SR 226 gets merged here. Besides, I don't see why the section on SR 24A wouldn't mention SR 331. – TMF 16:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

You know what? I'm changing my vote to Support. The SR 226 article has much more detai that the SR 24A chapter could use, and I still want to see both shields in the infobox. As for the issue of overlapping SR 331, I agree that there's no reason it shouldn't mention SR 331. The real difference between SR 24A and 226, is that 226 doesn't continue east of SR 331. ----DanTD (talk) 16:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

It should be noted that the SR 24A and CR 24B sections shouldn't be using full infoboxes. Both should be using {{infobox road small}}. – TMF 17:22, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I endorse all of TMF's comments here so far. Imzadi 1979 → 19:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Merger complete. ----DanTD (talk) 21:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Merger fixed. Secondary infoboxes should use {{infobox road small}}, just like in list articles. Imzadi 1979 → 22:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Someday I'll revive the intersections from the old infobox in an intersection junction. It's just a question of how to do it considering the fact that it covers two roads with three separate termini. ----DanTD (talk) 01:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Florida State Road 24. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306153400/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/ to http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/straight-linesonlinegis/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140306153400/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/ to http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/Straight-linesOnlineGIS/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/statistics/gis/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)