Talk:First West Yorkshire

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:First West Yorkshire/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

. Requires infobox Requires representative photographs Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates Copy edit for WP:MOS Keith D (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 16:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 15:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on First West Yorkshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113032724/http://www.westyorkshirebuses.freeserve.co.uk/riderhistory1.htm to http://www.westyorkshirebuses.freeserve.co.uk/riderhistory1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303220937/http://www.westyorkshirebuses.freeserve.co.uk/riderhistory3.htm to http://www.westyorkshirebuses.freeserve.co.uk/riderhistory3.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306063232/http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/mergers/decisions/2005/first-west to http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/mergers/decisions/2005/first-west

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Merge. Hullian111 (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

---

I believe that the articles First Leeds and First Bradford should be merged into this article because First Leeds is just a brand of FWY. First Leeds, Bradford, Halifax, Huddersfield (and even York if my sources are correct) are legally First West Yorkshire. So I believe that that article should be merged to this. To further support this First Halifax is already a redirect to this article. Slender (talk) 14:17, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

• I agree - merge them. --Bduke (talk) 07:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
• Support both. Toviemaix (talk) 06:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
• Support merger. No point untangling the mess of the Leeds fleet section if it can be easily broken down by region in First West Yorkshire. Seems a bit redundant to be writing the same things for the First Bradford article, too; there are no seperate First Doncaster and First Sheffield articles for First South Yorkshire, not to mention Bradford's article is largely unsourced. Hullian111 (talk) 15:19, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.