Talk:First Strike (Stargate Atlantis)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleFirst Strike (Stargate Atlantis) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2009Good article nomineeListed

edit war edit

First edit is copyvio from this page, and User:Xornok edit is all copyvio edit (24 episode eric..)--Zratinuf 19:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

um, that may have been the first edit but it has since changed... -Xornok 14:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
It does not matter Xornox, if it has been changed since then it is a derivative work, which still makes it a copyright violation. I have removed all the violating content, leaving just the first 2 non-violating edits.--Konst.ableTalk 11:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

not that important edit

There was a comma that didn't need to be there, so I got rid of it. Yeah, that's all.

Changing correct content edit

If people could stop going back to edit the plot summary and wrecking content that is in decent shape already, that would be great. Actually improving it is one thing, but having to go back and fix spelling/grammar/tone errors introduced for no good reason is getting old fast - the person that managed to use "brake" twice in place of "break" and "grase" instead of "graze", for example. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PhoenixFlare (talkcontribs) 18:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

This is a Wiki, anybody may edit, within reason, typos are a by-product of this. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 19:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'm not asking for anyone to be perfect, i'm asking that if you're still making grade school-level mistakes in your writing, maybe it would be a good idea to take some care. If I gave the impression that I wanted to force anybody to stop editing, I apologize, as I obviously don't have that power. As you say, though, anybody can edit, so i'll keep on trying to fix the mistakes. PhoenixFlare 22:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

"If Atlantis manages to reach its destination, the city and its inhabitants will have an extra layer of protection as neither the Wraith or the Asurans would know where they were to attack. It would also make the Tau'ri war against the Replicators easier as they can focus on offensive strategies without the fear of leaving Atlantis vulnerable without its guardian ships gone." Not only is this original research, but it's also wrong. Wraith are still under the impression that Atlantis was destroyed, and it does not take a genius to figure out where Atlantis might have been headed ( they chose the most obvious destination ).Itinerant1----

Most obvious? I don't think so. It wasn't the closest planet to Lantea, it was the closest planet with a large ocean meaning NOT the closest.

Vala M 14:48, 19 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Timeline edit

When did this episode take place? Did it take place before or after "Unending"? Or does it take place after "The Ark of Truth" since Col. Carter is on "Adrift". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.7.117 (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I believe it takes place after Unending as the next episode follows directly and Carter states that the Apollo doesnt have an asgard engineer indicating that they have committed mass euthanaisia. It may be after Ark Of Truth as Carter is on the Midway station wheras prior to Ark Of Truth all her efforts were concentrated on the Ori.Hdrit 20:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Stargate Atlantis -- 3x20.jpg edit

 

Image:Stargate Atlantis -- 3x20.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on First Strike (Stargate Atlantis). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply