Talk:First Harrogate Trains

Learn more about this page

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal First Harrogate Trains is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source information edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hull Trains' application to the ORR to run these services can be found at http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/server/show/ConWebDoc.7962 which should provide useful source material for this article. --RFBailey (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Why is this article illustrated with a picture of Cheltenham station? — iridescent 21:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think it is just to show the 180s. Year1989 (talk) 22:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't seem unreasonable to me: after all, it's the intended rolling stock in First's corporate livery. --RFBailey (talk) 05:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I wasn't thinking of it as a particular problem - just curious — iridescent 15:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh - sorry, just saw a 180 on their website so assumed that it would be operated by 180s. So I got a picture.

We shall change it if/when a new livery is applied or when they get started. Btline (talk) 16:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Outdated edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Given that this proposal seems to have died (along with their website...), this article needs updating at the very least, and possibly no longer needs to exist? --RFBailey (talk) 15:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest keeping the article in its current state, now that it has been modified to being past tense. Platinum Trains also needs the same treatment - its web site has died a death too. -- NRTurner (talk) 19:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic