Talk:First Battle of Naktong Bulge

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Battle of Naktong Bulge article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

First Battle of Naktong Bulge has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 3, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
April 12, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
April 27, 2010	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Current status: Good article

Military history: Asian / Korean / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Korea GA‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

GA

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by the Korean military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cold War GA‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
GA	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Battle of Naktong Bulge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is very well written with proper structure, inline citations and grammer. There were no problems that I could see with external links. I ran the article through AWB and only came up with a few items that I corrected. I hope you don't mind. I checked the images and they all look ok. There in one disambiguous link for Salient but nothing to hold the article back from being promoted in my opinion. Well done. --Kumioko (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC) Reviewer: Kumioko (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Can you feel the Love Company? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Any thoughts on identifying the companies by their phonetic identifiers? Hence, Able, Baker, Charlie, King, Love... TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 19:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I thought about that but I couldn't find the names of each company at the time so I thought it best to stick to the conservative names. —Ed!^(talk) 21:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic