| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Finding Freedom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Current? edit
I don't think Template:Current is appropriate on this article. Schazjmd (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Notability tag edit
I suggest there'll be plenty of cited material after publication on August 11th. Valetude (talk) 21:52, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Notability, possible expansion edit
I previously proposed this article for deletion, before the notice was removed by @71.105.208.210. This might seem redundant, I would like ask if any editors thought this article worth an extensive expansion, as its information at the time is minimal and usefulness reduced at best. I stand by my original opinion, but figured an rfc would be less controversial then a nomination for deletion. --Bettydaisies (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Definately not a PROD imho, there are a lot of high quality RS specifically on this book, like these. Would make a good expansion candidate, but stick to the best quality (e.g. WP:RS/P), as there is a lot of low-grade RS on this. 109.255.90.188 (talk) 10:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Fiction? edit
Why is the genre listed as fiction? Shouldn’t it be biography? 103.169.76.224 (talk) 11:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)