Talk:FindBugs

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Sources edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Would a blog entry on Java.net here count as a better source? I'm not sure. --Wrldwzrd89^talk 12:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge with SpotBugs edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

SpotBugs doesn't appear to have any independent notability. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Support merge to FindBugs. No need for two separate articles. In fact, for people looking into this area, having two articles actually makes their research more difficult.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:11, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Boldy merged just now - there is really very little justification for having separate articles. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article needs some expansion into context about SpotBugs edit

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The current description for SpotBugs talks about its timeframe and its plug-ins, but it doesn't give us much detail about how SpotBugs is applied in software development scenarios. Is it possible to extend the section and provide some examples on how SpotBugs can be applied?

E.g., how SpotBugs could impact the fault localization process in an organization. Inlin (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic