Talk:Final Exit

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as High-importance).

Please tell me. . . edit

How this book could be on the best seller list for 18 weeks in 1991 but be published in 1992??? HUH???

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Final Exit/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There are no specific citations in this article. Also, the comment about libraries refusing to stock the book...is that just black humor?

Last edited at 06:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 15:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

References in pop culture edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I agree that the section "appears to contain trivial, minor, or unrelated references to popular culture."

The guideline WP:RS says, "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered."

If these references are not cited by at least more than one WP:RS, they don't belong in the article. I don't think any of those references meet that test. I think the whole section should be deleted. --Nbauman (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic