Talk:Film à clef

Latest comment: 11 months ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Film à clef

Brz7 (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Making List More Accurate edit

Bully and Boys don't cry aren't really films à clef. They use the real names the people, and do not require the "key" required to figure it out.I have thus removed them from the examples. 24.148.26.74 (talk) 23:52, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is 'Walk the line' worth mentioning? --91.97.113.251 (talk) 01:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

would 'Saving Private Ryan' count as a films à clef with regards to the Niland brothers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lambeth1661 (talkcontribs) 00:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

'The Master'? --luckymustard (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

WorldCat Genres edit

Hello, I'm working with OCLC, and we are algorithmically generating data about different Genres, like notable Authors, Book, Movies, Subjects, Characters and Places. We have determined that this Wikipedia page has a close affintity to our detected Genere of romans-a-clef. It might be useful to look at [1] for more information. Thanks. Maximilianklein (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I recommend deletion edit

It's a dictionary entry, with an appended list of OR.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 03:06, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recommendation posted. Any discussion?
Weeb Dingle (talk) 03:22, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article should be expanded, not deleted. Example Roman à clef. Brz7 (talk) 09:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Illogic is a poor argument. It remains a puffed-up dictionary entry, and any who'd claim it has potential utility are unable to turn it into something encyclopedic. I am not here to salvage all the abandoned ugly puppies littering Wikipedia. Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
A compromise: I will wait until the end of September (2017) before removing all of the "notable" examples that aren't at that time linked to a credible source. Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Vote MERGE into Roman à clef (or just delete), furthermore most of the entries here are not true but instead "based on ..." which is different than "literally IS ... except with a name change" Hornpipe2 (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Film à clef edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Film à clef's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "auto1":

  • From Greek junta: Clogg, Richard "The Ideology of the "revolution of 21 April 1967'" pp. 36–58 from Greece Under Military Rule edited by Richard Clogg & George Yannopoloulos; London: Secker & Warburg, 1971 p. 43.
  • From Arthouse science fiction film: "10 Essential Arthouse Sci-Fi Films". Film School Rejects. 1 September 2018.
  • From Amanda Knox: "Professor: Amanda Knox trial shows problems with comparing legal systems". Today. University of Kansas. February 4, 2015.
  • From William Randolph Hearst: Ogden Hoffman, 1862, Reports of Land Cases Determined in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Numa Hubert, San Francisco
  • From Charlie Kaufman: "Being Charlie Kaufman". Salon. November 11, 1999. Retrieved June 24, 2020.
  • From New Hollywood: "Critical Discussion Transforms Art: Haile Gerima, the L.A. Rebellion, and Cinema as Life, PopMatters". November 18, 2019.
  • From Gong'an fiction: St. André, 2002, p. 44
  • From Robert Durst: "Westchester DA to impanel grand jury on disappearance of Robert Durst's wife". October 10, 2021. Archived from the original on October 13, 2021. Retrieved October 14, 2021.
  • From Road movie: "Dhanak | Rainbow | Regenbogen". www.berlinale.de.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs. AnomieBOT 18:32, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply