Talk:Fibrothorax/GA2
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tom (LT) (talk · contribs) 03:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
I will take this review. I've reviewed 60+ other articles, including relating to medicine and anatomy, and will review this article against the 6 good article criteria. I'll read over this article and have a think, then start the review in 2-3 days. --Tom (LT) (talk) 03:55, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have read this article and have commentary to supply. However, I am reviewing another article by the same nominator, Epidural haematoma, which has had no replies despite my review, so I am going to mark this review as on hold to save me + the nominator time if they are inactive.--Tom (LT) (talk) 23:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Tom (LT): Hey Tom, are you planning on starting this review soon? Just wondering since it has been open for over a month now. :) --Dom497 (talk) 02:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure, I'd be happy for you to take it up. I was going to review but the nominator (Steve Mulch Civic (Pro)) is barely active and practically didn't respond at all at the other GA, so I think a detailed review is likely to be a waste of time. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Tom (LT): Hey Tom, are you planning on starting this review soon? Just wondering since it has been open for over a month now. :) --Dom497 (talk) 02:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
I nominated this because when it failed the last nomination, I fixed everything and then nominated it. - ❄️Steve talk? 13:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Tom (LT), I can understand your frustration; I notice that Epidural haematoma was ultimately closed due to inadequate response from the nominator. I don't think Dom497 was offering to take over (nor am I), but just wondering what the hold-up was. It's up to you how you'd like to proceed: do a review, perhaps in sections to see whether prompt and adequate response is being made to the issues raised (and if not, close it), or withdraw from the review, in which case the nomination will go back into the pool of those awaiting reviewers. Just let us know if the decision is to withdraw, so we can take care of the necessary steps to get it back into the pool. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset, withdraw. --Tom (LT) (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
- Tom (LT), done. Nomination is back in the pool of those awaiting review. Thanks for letting me know. BlueMoonset (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)