Talk:Fiber rope
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Redditaddict69 in topic well sourced content deleted
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fiber rope redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
The contents of the Fiber rope page were merged into Rope and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
well sourced content deleted edit
So I have replaced it. -Roxy, the Prod. wooF 16:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Roxy the dog: Duplicates another article. Already sourced elsewhere. Consider proposing a merge to Rope. Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 17:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Of course it is sourced elsewhere. So What? -Roxy, the Prod. wooF 18:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Roxy the dog: As in, all of the content is featured another article. As I stated before. Please consider proposing a merge if you feel so strongly. I have reported the issue to an admin to deal with this situation properly. Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 20:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Of course it is sourced elsewhere. So What? -Roxy, the Prod. wooF 18:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)