This article has multiple issues -- template messages

edit

I found the following template messages at the head of this article. I have addressed them all and will remove them -- except for the following, which I don't feel I have adequately dealt with.
This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (January 2016)


This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. (March 2016) This article has no links to other Wikipedia articles. (May 2016) This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (May 2016)
--Brenont (talk) 02:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Claims to uniqueness

edit

The article claims the bridge design to be unique or nearly so because (1) the suspension chains aren't anchored in the ground - this is not even slightly unique, this is a Self-anchored suspension bridge, another example in the UK is Chelsea Bridge. (2) the suspension "chains" are made from riveted plate rather than from chains or wire cables, again not unique, other examples include Grunwald Bridge in Wroclaw, and Tower Bridge in London.