Talk:Fatherland Front (Austria)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Beyond My Ken in topic "Austrofascism"

Proposed Move to Fatherland Front edit

Fatherland's Front is a bad translation and almost never used. Fatherland Front is more correct. Cripipper (talk) 16:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mass Movement edit

A movement with 3 million members, particularly when the total population was only 6.5 million, is by any definition a mass movement - why say it wasn't?124.197.15.138 (talk) 04:47, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

ya that doesn't make any sence134.3.76.108 (talk) 08:24, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Anti-capitalist? edit

The Ideology sidebar claims austrofascism was anti-capitalist, and cites page 127 (249? unclear) of the Pelinka book. Searching the text (available in the citation link) does not turn up any mention of austrofascism as anti-capitalist, in fact just the opposite: heavily repeated mentions of the austrofascists as a corporatist, pro-capitalist party that gave power to corporations. This unsupported categorization from the Ideology sidebar should be deleted.73.149.3.88 (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Austrofascism" edit

Is "Austrofascist" really the right word to describe the Federal State of Austria. Fascism and what Austria espoused during this time were two very different things. "Austrofascism" seems to be more of a one-sided term than anything... KEleison (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cleofascism edit

Cleofascism and Austrofascism are they exclude each other because Austrofascism is fascism only in name because it is not totalitarian but authoritarian, while clerical fascism is totalitarian and full-fledged fascism is therefore mutually exclusive. Please for intervention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.31.73.132 (talk) 10:47, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Austrofascism" edit

An IP editor is attempting to change several parts of the article to use "Austrofascism". Unfortunately, we do not have an article on Austrofascism, so the IP is linking to the article on German Wikipedia. This is not acceptable. If the IP wants to write an article on Austrofascism, they can link to it then, but linking to a German language article is not something that is helpful to our readers. Without an article "Austrofascism" is just a buzzword. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)Reply