Talk:Fast Money (talk show)/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
If you like
If you like the Fast money show you should check out -spam link removed- as the site updates the latest stock picks from the TV show.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.167.56.62 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 25 April 2007
Any more information on Strazzini leaving?
I'm unable to find any additional information on Strazzini's departure, but I'd like to see a better article referenced when it comes available. 75.162.250.125 (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Well if you check out CNBC's Fast Money page, you'll see his profile was pulled as well (http://www.cnbc.com/id/15838499) Vikramsidhu 11:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Which tells us nothing. It also looks like someone rolled back the edit, which I did not do, about Strazzini's departure. Wikipedia fails again. 67.106.39.10 (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
why did this happen....i cant find an explanation and would really like one
Fast Money (CNBC)Tim Strazzini, an original panelist, was let go by the network on May 18, 2007. 63.139.15.131 (talk) 22:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- You cannot find additional information on Strazzini's departure because Wikipedia is wrong. Strazzini had requested a voluntary leave of absence and has not been 'let go' by the show. It is still undetermined whether he will return. 66.7.81.66 (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
>> Here's the real "scoop" -- After Strazzini left, apparently he first posted a few sentences at a blog saying that he felt Fast Money was taking away too much time from his family and all that and that was his reason for leaving. But the real story seems to be that he feels he wasn't being treated well at the network (i.e. he wasn't being treated as the "star" he thought he was). He left CNBC and was seen on Fox the next day. CNBC was upset because of Strazzini's non-compete clause, so they sued and tried to prevent him from joining Fox before his non-compete was up. CNBC lost. Strazzini came on Fox again. CNBC sued again. CNBC lost -- again. And now Strazzini appears on Fox once in a while, and all indications point to him being on the new Fox Biz channel. Vik —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 01:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Guys
Hi, Guys: "Fast Money" is one of those shows where the word "guys" is repeated endlessly, guys. You know, where a group of women is called "guys" too? Well, guys, I hope the guys here like the guys on "Fast Money," guys, and all the guys who watch the guys on the show, guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.149.32 (talk) 01:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey guys...I can barely hear Dylan Ratigan when he shouts, he needs to be louder and stutter more. Hey guys, he's almost like David Letterman with hemroids. Hey guys, Guy Adami hasn't had a winning pick since circa 2007... Hey guys, the show isn't the same since Eric Bolling left.
"All right..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.26.252.53 (talk) 00:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fast money 010307b.standard.jpg
Image:Fast money 010307b.standard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fastmoneysept16.jpg
Image:Fastmoneysept16.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Few problems in the 'segment' section
In the 'segments' section, a few things are listed that really only apply to graphics within the show. Two examples would be 'trade school' and 'the takedown,' which generally pop up as graphics during discussions in the 'Word on the Street' segment (and others). If Wikipedia lists list those, it might as well include 'next trade,' 'the trade is' and the 'I'm a (buyer/seller)' graphics. Graphic stuff like that should be integrated into a (new) section about the heavy use of graphics on the show.
Also, we completely dropped the ball on 'Fast Money Madness,' an annual segment and tournament held at the end of March and beginning of April (in a tribute, it would seem, to March madness) In Fast Money Madness, they take 64 top stocks and pick the winner for the next 12 months
Themerrill (talk) 04:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Dylan Ratigan leaving
There's a sentence here that seems to say that Dylan left the show due to, or because of, his reporting about Goldman Sachs. This implication conflicts with the story on his personal page, which says that his contract ended. One of these sentences should be changed to reflect the nature of his leaving the show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.145.240.14 (talk) 20:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Fast Money (talk show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081007182052/http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/programming_changes_at_cnbc_67915.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/programming_changes_at_cnbc_67915.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090702032422/http://www.nypost.com/seven/03272009/gossip/pagesix/fast_flare_up_rattles_cnbc_161468.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/03272009/gossip/pagesix/fast_flare_up_rattles_cnbc_161468.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930210136/http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/new_panelist_on_fast_money_59451.asp to http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/cnbc/new_panelist_on_fast_money_59451.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)