Talk:Fairchild BQ-3
Latest comment: 11 years ago by The Bushranger in topic Why not combine these three pages?
 | A fact from Fairchild BQ-3 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why not combine these three pages? edit
Given the common purpose of the BQ's 1, 2 and 3, their very short histories, and the miniscule numbers of each produced, it would seem to me to be more logical to combine these three pages. File that under "for what it's worth."
Terry J. Carter (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- The BQ-3 is a wholly different type; combining it wouldn't be proper. I was originally going to write the BQ-1 and BQ-2 as a single article; however the fact the BQ-1 flew after the BQ-2 made the history narrartive awkward, so I split them. As seperate types they are all independently notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)