Talk:FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legislation edit
I don't see why the 2003 bill designed to outlaw the dirty words was included. The bill didn't pass, and there are thousands of bills introduced every year which don't pass -- we don't put every piece of proposed legislation on a Wikipedia page, do we? Additionally, the link to the bill is broken. If no one objects, I'll delete the legislation section in a few days. If someone objects, well, let's discuss. :-) Ztrawhcs 17:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Non-functioning links edit
The EFF and Findlaw links to the text of the judgment are non-functional. 58.8.107.132 (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Clarify second circuit court decison edit
What Second Circuit Appeals Court freedom of speech case or cases in 2010 is or are referenced by the "second circuit court" link? I found: Weintraub v. Board of Education of the City of New York, 27 January 2010. If this is correct, then maybe linking to the case might be more useful than linking to the court jurisdiction the case was decited in. Gauzeandchess (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Docket Numbers edit
Docket Numbers e.g. 77-528 should be used Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 02:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)