Talk:F2FS

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Leo Navis in topic Rationale

Removed old comments dating back as far as 2012. F2FS has matured and is in productive use. There is no question as to its notability or relevance.

Additional sources to add edit

Here is a 2019 article "Evaluating File System Reliability on Solid State Drives", which appears to be a quality source about F2FS which could be added to the article. --Roman Riabenko (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rationale edit

Any info or statistics on what it's intended to improve on, and how well that works? Like does it wear out the Flash at a slower rate than EXT4 for instance? — Omegatron (talk) 12:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Found this dude who did quite a few benchmarks on linux-5.0 (so not too recent, but not too old either). Maybe you could summarize and include it in the article. In general, I cannot find much. --Leo Navis (talk) 16:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply