Talk:EyeEm
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EyeEm article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Advertising edit
This seems to be advertising.92.200.119.68 (talk) 22:09, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
The original article was not 100% compliant with the guidelines and neutrality of Wikipedia but it was not an overt advertising either Flagging it as advertising from an account without a username makes it quite questionable. There has been numerous edits since and it would be nice if the person who flagged this as an advertising could review the tag. Cobynarra (talk) 13:41, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
It has been over a week that the advertising claim has been raised and nobody has supported that this article still seems to be an advertising. The original flag was also done by a non user. I am taking down the advertising tag and am welcoming any further feedback to improve this article. Cobynarra (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
Edits needed to article after acquisition by Talenthouse edit
A recent Techcrunch article noted that EyeEm was acquired by Talenthouse in June 2021 for around $40M USD. I added a note to the article about this and updated part of the infobox, but further changes to the article may be needed to reflect the new ownership. I see a post on EyeEm's site (primary source), but haven't been able to find much more. I don't have time to do research now and make any tweaks to the article, but wanted to flag it in case other editors do have time. - Dyork (talk) 15:49, 17 May 2022 (UTC)