Talk:Evidence Eliminator

I've removed the edits about the critical sites as they aren't really relevant and seem to be an attempt at subtly discrediting them by implying an agenda on their part. Ydam 23:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I have attempted to clean up the article a bit. The article as it is is perhaps somewhat soft on the company, but does contain links to critical sites. If someone can better document allegations that Robin Hood Software are themselves spammers, etc., please do so, with references. I think it is difficult to find neutral sources on this, since the "flame war" between RHS and its critics has been so intense. --Brianyoumans 21:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

RHS themselves have never engaged in spamming. They're far too clever for that. Instead they have an attractive affiliate programme and instruct their affiliates in how to spam. There are several cases where things got really out of hand. There is an account of one such incident here.

http://radsoft.net/resources/software/reviews/ee/0b.shtml

Eventually a rep for a US west coast telco came online, explained this particular spammer was gone, and apologised on behalf of his company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.217.145.206 (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Evel.png

Image:Evel.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

But after all is still confuse to everybody that try to get that software, now what next ? what the consumers can do ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.75.131 (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Google for "eraser freeware download"? --Rodhullandemu 23:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

From 217.43.192.244 (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC): Wouldn't this do? (in response to Rodhullandemu's comment) https://eraser.heidi.ie/

Out of business

The article has major neutrality issues, but especially this section. I have reverted a large section of this section and renamed it "History" as it is either unreferenced or poorly referenced. We don't need the business address in an encyclopedia article, and accusations of gun crime must be linked to impeccable sources - if you can cite significant coverage in all the major broadsheets multiple times, that would probably pass WP:BLP, but not before. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:16, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Evidence Eliminator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071005153415/http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/process.d2w to http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/process.d2w
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060704232152/http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/product.d2w to http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/product.d2w
• Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20121106104033/http%3A//www.bis.gov.uk/files/file52783.pdf to http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file52783.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)