 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Puffery edit
Hey @Valdi Uriks, it’s great that you’ve expanded the article a bit, but I’m a bit worried that the language is a bit puffy. Encyclopedic style can be a bit tricky, but it’s easier if you think of it being strictly factual, without any sense of talking to the reader. Of course it helps if you think of it as only restating plainly what reliable sources have said about the subject. As someone who clearly has some knowledge of the exchange, are you able to cite any sources? — HTGS (talk) 19:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- yes, you are totally right. the language looks really puffy. I just did notice it Valdi Uriks (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- already changed and reduced significantly Valdi Uriks (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)