Talk:EuroBasket 2011

Relevance

I do not know whom to trust and to follow in order to fill the tables. On the website, on right, you can see the groups and their ordering is totally different then this one in the article. Consequently to that the schedule on the official page is totally different then this one in the article. Something should be corrected.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 20:24, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Everything is corrected.--MacedonianBoy (talk) 21:13, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

References

Cannot reach reference links from 4 to 11 Vlyalcin (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Goal difference - Goal average

Goal difference will not be used, but goal average. --Sayka41 (talk) 20:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Good point. So we should discard goal difference and instead use goal average too. -Koppapa (talk) 21:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

I changed Groups A and B to goal average and sourced the tie breaked in the article before the group stage. One question the regulations don't aswer. Is goal average rounded up, down or mathematically to how many digits? Or is the fraction used without rounding? -Koppapa (talk) 07:36, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't think there is any rounding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayka41 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

There is always rounding in such cases.--79.236.57.252 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Overall goal average (the stat used in the tables) is only used when all teams are tied. I would've preferred the retention of point differentials in the tables, though. –HTD 09:02, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Article has way too much stats now

Game by game statistics for all teams are definately not needed. Wikipedia is not a stats website. Team tournament highs don't belong here neither, i'd think. Any more comments on this? -Koppapa (talk) 09:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Statistics are also "information"s. And wikipedia is the place of such informations. I spent a lot of time for that statistics. Why did you delete them? Are you calling this information sharing? At least you could wait for a comment before you delete all of them. Wikipedia is a place of ll kind of information including some statistics. You cannot delete them before asking and getting some answers. At least have some respect on people's efforts on such entries before you think to delete them. I am shocked and very surprised when I could not see my work on the page. If you don't like the information then leave it instead of deleting them. I don't know if complaining is possible on wikipedia. If it is then I'll do some effort on it. Magawla (talk) 22:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC) magawla

I just found they add little info to the article. What's next, addind all 200 players with their individual stats here? But let the majority decide. -Koppapa (talk) 08:40, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Why would the statistica of 200 players on that page bother you? Isn't it an information too? What does wikipedia mean for you? If you think that some information on a page is unnecessary from your aspect than make an offer to put that information on another page before deleting all of them.

You are talking about majority? Which majority are you talking about? You think that you are that majority? You decided to delete the information and did. That's all, huh? So you have chosen yourself as the almighty majority? HAVE SOME RESPECT FOR PEOPLE'S ENTRIES & EFFORTS BEFORE YOU DELETE THEM!!! And one more thing? How dare you delete my entries on which I've spent hours? WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? And you almighty(!) also have deleted my all table templates. Will you give me my templates back? Not the statistics are unnecessary on wikipedia pages on the contrary brash people like yourself are not needed on this platform. Your lost magic word is: RESPECT! This will solve your problem. Unfortunately wikipedia board can't do anything to the brash people like you. 193.140.74.21 (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)magawla

Guess you are Magawla. I told you on your talk page how to get back the information you added. Feel free to re-add. I don't care. -Koppapa (talk) 10:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Statistics about McCalebb

In the section called "Individual Tournament Highs" some information about Bo McCalebb was incorrect. Sadly, the "individual statistics" section in the official web page does not seem to work. I´ve found a page where the information seems to be correct, but it´s not easy to read (McCalebb doesn´t play for Italy). So, any contribution will be wellcome.--Noventamilcientoveinticinco (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:FIBA EuroBasket which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on EuroBasket 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725190746/http://www.eurobasket2011.com/en/coid_grVrtrKvGNcoMAgYHLOdl0.articleMode_on.html to http://www.eurobasket2011.com/en/coid_grVrtrKvGNcoMAgYHLOdl0.articleMode_on.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150725190746/http://www.eurobasket2011.com/en/coid_grVrtrKvGNcoMAgYHLOdl0.articleMode_on.html to http://www.eurobasket2011.com/en/coid_grVrtrKvGNcoMAgYHLOdl0.articleMode_on.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on EuroBasket 2011. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324145340/http://basket.lv/viriesu_izlase/19082011-latvijas_valstsvienibas_speles_eiropas_ce to http://basket.lv/viriesu_izlase/19082011-latvijas_valstsvienibas_speles_eiropas_ce

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Order ???

What order is this in the article? The Final Ranking is before the games??? OMG !!!--Anaxagoras13 (talk) 15:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)