Talk:Ettore Gotti Tedeschi
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Johnpacklambert in topic Too much Dan Brown
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Comments edit
This article is poorly written. The reference to "Pope Ratinzger" [sic] is particularly insulting--unworthy of Wikipedia.192.195.154.9 (talk) 23:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Then why don't you fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.162.140.53 (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Bias in the article edit
The removal from office of Tedeschi is a more complexed and contested story than this article suggests. I am going to try to edit those questionable claims.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Too much Dan Brown edit
This article seems to be the result of someone spending too much time reading the Da Vinci code. The attempts at interlinking and name dropping do not serve the article well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)