Talk:Essentially contested concept

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Social and political / Religion B‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

B

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics
	Social and political philosophy
	Philosophy of religion

Lindsay658, master of disguise edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Inserted new "Concepts/notions vs. conceptions/instantiations" from 129.94.6.28 (I forgot to log in) Lindsay658 07:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Made last edit from 129.94.6.30, forgetting to log in (again!!!). Sorry to confuse things Lindsay658 08:17, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Reversion edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I have reverted the previous change made by 66.30.181.33 because, regardless of what he/she may think of what was said, the text is a direct quotation -- and, therefore, must remain in its correct form.Lindsay658 07:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can somebody write references in normal way? This is difficult to understand. --147.251.103.20 (talk) 09:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic