Feedback from New Page Review process edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Apparently he was deaf: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=G1EEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA8&dq=Ernest+G.+McCauley&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjmoe2sh8DqAhWEsaQKHcpuDWUQ6AEwAHoECAMQAg#v=onepage&q=Ernest%20G.%20McCauley&f=false

There is more gbook references. Use [1] to format them..

scope_creepTalk 11:26, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Most of "McCauley propeller legacy​" section belongs in the company article, instead. edit

Most of text in the "McCauley propeller legacy​" section refers to developments occurring after Mr. McCauley's death in 1969. Those items, at least, belong in the company article McCauley Propeller Systems, instead. It is misleading to list them in this article about Mr. McCauley, as it gives the impression that they were his inventions -- which, judging from careful scrutiny of the dates given, they were not. Mr. McCauley's legacy is significant enough without adding in the developments of others.

~ Zxtxtxz (talk) 12:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply