Talk:Erastria coloraria
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Petty whin? edit
@Edibobb: I couldn't find a source to support the common name "petty whin". Where'd you find that? Thanks SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:51, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
It came from eol.org. Here's the record below. Looking on Google just now, I didn't see that name with this moth (although it is listed with a casebearer moth). Do you think I should remove it?
They also misspelled Broad-lined Erastr[i]a. I had to remove that duplicate today when I posted. I wondered where that came from too, but I was too lazy to track it down.
"315304": { "identifier": 315304, "scientificName": "Erastria coloraria Fabricius 1798", "richness_score": 200.0, "synonyms": [{ "synonym": "Catopyrrha coloraria (Fabricius, 1798)", "relationship": "subsequent name/combination", "resource": "Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)" }], "vernacularNames": [{ "vernacularName": "Broad-lined Erastra", "language": "en", "eol_preferred": true }, { "vernacularName": "Petty Whin", "language": "en" }], Bob Webster (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I see it now at http://eol.org/pages/315304/names/common_names. They source it to NatureServe Threatened Species, but I can't find any support for it. I suspect it's an error or very rare. It's also the name of a plant. I'd suggest removing it. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)