Talk:Eraser (film)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Jimw338 in topic Should be remanded to "Eraser (1996 film)"?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eraser (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Language edit
Can someone who is fluent in the english language please go over the plot? -- Imladros (talk) 07:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Electronic pulse rifle edit
Can those words really mean railgun as the link indicates? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.235.135.195 (talk) 15:44, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- No. However, from the movie description, the words are wrong. An electronic pulse gun would probably mean an EMP, or electromagnetic pulse, gun. By the description from the film (the actual visuals set aside as "movie magic"), this is a railgun, not an "electronic pulse gun". (EMPs do not have a physical projectile, but are rather a "pulse" of electromagnetic energy.) 130.76.96.103 (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Should be remanded to "Eraser (1996 film)"? edit
Should this be renamed to "Eraser (1996 film)", given that there was another one in 2012? Jimw338 (talk) 03:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)