Talk:Epigoni (epic)

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

All text here is also at Epigoni, where it belongs, in order to complete the coverage of the phenomenon. This mifght well be made a redirect. --Wetman 20:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't quite know what you mean by "the phenomenon". On the whole I think it more useful to have separate articles for people and for books (even books that don't survive): 1. because other articles will need to link to one or the other, not to a mixture of the two; 2. because they will belong to different categories. Additionally, in this case, other lost early Greek epics have articles, so it seems helpful if this does too. Those are the reasons why I made the article. So I (mildly) object to the merge. Andrew Dalby 20:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I hadn't noticed till now that there is already an article on the lost Sophocles play Epigoni. This makes me even more convinced that each of the three articles has its proper place: it wouldn't be helpful to combine them. Andrew Dalby 19:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic