Talk:English Springer Spaniel/GA2
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Miyagawa in topic GA Reassessment
GA Reassessment edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As far as I see it, this article has several referencing issues for starters. References #4, 7, 14, and 15 cannot be considered reliable. Plus there is a deadline on another reference.
In addition, the history of the breed is rather lacking. There is more information on Norfolk Spaniel than there is on here. Based on that I no longer thing this meets the GA criteria (and I was the original nominator). I'll give it a week in case someone else wants to come forward and fix this article (however I would argue that it never really met the GA standard that should have been set). Miyagawa (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)