Talk:Energy Retail Association
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability edit
Reviewing this article as a part of WikiProject Notability: subject appears to be a reasonably notable trade organisation, 11,800 Ghits [1]; third-party coverage: [2], engagement with governmental bodies [3], Citizens' Advice Bureaux recognise them [4]. Removing notability tag, but article needs expanding. DWaterson 21:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Advert, Totally unreferenced article with bold claims, POV edit
I dispute the neutrality of this article. These bold claims are unreferenced, please help by providing refs or they can be removed. I replaced the fuel poverty causes by those on the fuel poverty article. Feel free to boldly edit this article, providing references for actions by the ERA. Widefox (talk) 09:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV edit
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)