Talk:Endomembrane system/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

• Comment - I won't be conducting the review, but to save the reviewer some time references all check out. ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 14:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   The prose of the article is generally good. That said, it could benefit from a light copyedit before going for FA.

   B. MoS compliance:

   MoS stuff all checks out. Refs are in order,

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Though not quite up to FA-Standard, the citing of this article is generally quite dense, and more than passes the GA-Criteria.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   This is of much more use than last-year's biology textbook ever will be ;)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I read this article to death for about the last two hours, and I can honestly find no faults that are notable enough to pick up at the GA level. It still has some work to go before FA (notably citation density and prose quality), but everything checks out for GA. Well Done! Cam ^(Chat) 19:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)