Talk:Endogeny (biology)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Chiswick Chap in topic Other fields
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-11-04. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Older comments edit
I think it might be a good idea to merge this article with exogenous. Just my 2 cents.
Merge proposal: Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) edit
I propose to merge Exogeny into Endogeny (biology) since they cover sufficiently similar topics that they can be explained within the same context. Jamgoodman (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Other fields edit
The title and lede are written in order to make this an article about biology. The section about the term in other fields is off-topic. This is what hatnotes are for. Wikiacc (¶) 03:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comments invited. (Pinging Jamgoodman.) Wikiacc (¶) 03:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, all that stuff was, with respect, rubbish, totally off-topic. All that's left is a WP:DICDEF which shouldn't be on Wikipedia either. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)