Talk:Endel Aruja

Notice: This article does not verifiably establish WP:BIO

In my opinion, this article either does not verifiably satisfy the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.

Untitled

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable sources in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.

Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, perhaps User:Digwuren (talk · contribs), or other recent contributors to this article, will make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.

Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

To better understand why I have used this template, please read Flag templates for deletion warnings ... I realize that some of the expressed possible concerns may not be appropriate in this case. — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 22:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

In summary, this anonymous editor is claiming that somehow, somewhere, something is wrong with this article, but he doesn't even know what it is.

There is no point in entertaining this idea any further, I'd say. Διγουρεν_{Εμπρος!} 22:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Specifically, this article lacks reliable secondary sources to establish that the subject meets the Wikipedia:Notability (people) criteria ... a link to a website associated with the subject does not satisfy the independent part of the requirements. — 72.75.110.31 (talk) 22:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Category:Flagged articles

I have removed the [[Category:Flagged articles]] from the message above . it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, but the current version looks OK to me. ^Avicenna_sis @ 03:59, 8 April 2010 (UTC)