Talk:Empros

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Duration of "Batu" edit

When I added the song durations to this page, I took them directly from Allmusic's entry for Empros (a generally reliable source) which lists the length for "Batu" as 6:16. However, with this edit a user added the following footnote: "On the digital version, 'Batu' spans 10:06 with a drone transition." I can verify this since I have a digital copy, and this is the length of the song on my copy. The question now is whether the other half of this claim is true, or if Allmusic simply made an error. Can anyone with a non-digital copy verify the duration of "Batu"? Thanks! Fezmar9 (talk) 22:52, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

There's an official quote at atpr. –Pomte 15:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Neither AfterthePostRock nor forums in general qualify as reliable sources. Fezmar9 (talk) 00:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I didn't link that with the intention of using it as a reliable source in the article. You seriously want a reliable source for a track duration after implying that self-verification by buying the album is good enough, and after providing a reliable source in Allmusic yourself? Is there a policy for this for the hundreds of thousands of album and song articles? Either way, you can email Sargent House yourself and get them to post it publicly. –Pomte 06:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
According to Wikipedia's policy on verification, any material that is challenged requires verification. Typically, record labels make public any large difference between album versions. A four-minute longer track is kind of a large difference, yet Sargent House never made this public. Therefore, I am challenging this. I still don't see anything concrete to persuade me as a reader that this information is valid. Fezmar9 (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
The official download at the band's bandcamp page lists Batu as 10:06, while the preview stream at spin.com has Batu in a 6:16 version. 95.116.206.247 (talk) 16:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Empros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Empros. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)Reply