Talk:Emotional lability

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Psychiatry Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

A fact from Emotional lability appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that emotional lability can be seen in conditions such as personality disorder, bipolar disorder, ADHD, and alcohol intoxication, or after a stroke?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emotional lability.

Wikipedia

Redundant? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I just added the word "sudden" to the first sentence in the lead, but are the underlined parts redundant: "emotional lability is a sign or symptom typified by sudden, exaggerated changes in mood or affect in quick succession"? I can't decide. —PermStrump(talk) 23:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Err, possibly. The rapidity is a feature so maybe best to use at least one word highlighting this. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic