Talk:Emohawk: Polymorph II

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British / Episode coverage / Red Dwarf Start‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Red Dwarf task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article issues edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

3rd party sources - Most of the references are from the BBC or RedDwarf.co.uk (the official site).
Notability - The article doesn't establish notability and lacks 3rd party sources.
Insufficient context - I think this edit should help [1] (it clarifies that RD is a sci-fi sitcom).
Unencyclopedic

I did not tag the article, I'm clarifying what I think needs to be done. --Mrwojo (talk) 19:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your efforts in contributing to this article, Mrwojo. But as you've probably discovered yourself, 3rd party sources on this episode are hard to find, if they exist at all. And because of this the article will never gain notability.

While I agree with the Tag, it still seems strange that a non-current British television series receives so much attention yet there are so many more articles deserving of the same treatment, e.g. There must be about 400 plus Simpsons articles with the majority of them failing the exact same Tag issues. --Nreive (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since the series itself is notable, and every other episode in the series is listed, it would be stupid to delete this one article as 'non-notable'. Applying common sense -- Tags removed. EdJogg (talk) 00:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic