Talk:Ellis–Van Creveld syndrome
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Ellis–Van Creveld syndrome.
|
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Censorship? edit
The phrase "The term, however, has been found offensive by some... For this reason, 6-fingered dwarfism has been removed as an alternative name for this entry." implies censorship. Thoughts? KarikaSlayer (talk) 18:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better retain the usage while noting its deprecation, e.g. "redirect from 6-fingered dwarfism (deprecated because some considered it offensive)" CharlesHBennett (talk) 16:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
"felicitous"? edit
The final section states "This leaves Ellis–van Creveld syndrome with its felicitous abbreviation, EVC, as the only satisfactory designation." It's not clear what is "felicitous" about this abbreviation. I'd appreciate it if someone with that information would edit this sentence to clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Untorqued (talk • contribs) 01:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ellis–van Creveld syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070412192836/http://www.ellisvancreveld.co.uk/ to http://www.ellisvancreveld.co.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)