Talk:Ellen Johnson
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 22 January 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Categorization edit
Does anyone else feel that this article is a little politically incorrect being classified by Wikipedia as one of a "religious figure"? (As an Atheist she is without religion.)
Not notable edit
This page is really just a resume for a rather insignificant figure. Just being the head of an organization does not warrant encyclopedic merit. Perhaps if this article weren't mainly comprised of references to various pieces she's written and TV appearances I'd feel differently. --NEMT 01:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
What has she been doing since 2008? JimFarm (talk)
- It's not a great article, but the organization is fairly notable and she's been on national news programs. That is notable enough to count. She's certainly as notable as say Jessie Jane Duff or Barbara Loe Fisher.--T. Anthony 12:16, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well since Jessie Jane Duff got deleted, maybe it's time for an AFD? --PEAR (talk) 17:49, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
That horrible section of unreferenced media info edit
I've removed it per WP:NOT. As some other editors already posted, it made the article look like a resume. It was also completely pointless.
The article is much better looking, easier to read, meaningful, and concise without it.
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ellen Johnson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726180649/http://www.infidels.org/wire/stories/?aa_030204.html to http://infidels.org/wire/stories/?aa_030204.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)