Talk:Element OS

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Ahunt in topic External links modified

This is currently a small page about a linux distrobution that will be expanded in the next few days. Any linux distrobution should have it's own wiki page so that people who are wondering what a distobution is, they can look it up. 83.109.119.242 (talk) 19:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notability edit

The article has been tagged for notability. I would contend that the first ref cited already established that, although more third party refs could be added. - Ahunt (talk) 17:33, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

This distro has been pretty well covered in the media, so it is easy to find refs for it. I have added three more and will remove the notability tag. - Ahunt (talk) 17:44, 4 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
You don't seem to be using "the media" in the usual sense. References link to a blog and some Linux distribution website I had never heard about. In its current form, the article still leaves doubts about the subject's notability. --Chealer (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
It has two highly reliable sources, DistroWatch and Linux Today, plus two lesser ones. DistroWatch is reliable enough by itself to establish notability for Linux distros. How many do you want? - Ahunt (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
The tag is not about reliability, it is about notability. --Chealer (talk) 17:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sigh - reliable sources establish notability as per WP:N, which says: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.". - Ahunt (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Since it has been a week with no further discussion of this topic I will remove the tag. - Ahunt (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Element OS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  - Ahunt (talk) 13:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
 , it is still a good archive link. - Ahunt (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply