Fair use rationale for Image:Pogon Lwow.png edit

 

Image:Pogon Lwow.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with File:Cracovia.png edit

The image File:Cracovia.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to be doing some editing edit

I am making an effort to improve all Polish football related articles in the near future, and I am starting with this article. Expect some changes around here, one notable one that is already done is the beginning. I basically, want to see my countries articles as good as the likes of the Premier league and Bundesligga. (our level of football to, but that will take along time! :D)

If you guys pitch in a little that'd be great!

thelastone36 (talk) 03:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good job, I noticed one mistake, they listed champion in plural, we can't have TWO champions, as Wikipedia claim, besides Widzew doesn't even play in ekstraklasa, for folks not familiar with Polish league it's very misleading information, Lelek 1313 (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Kadra1927.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:Kadra1927.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 29 June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article outdated edit

The article needs to be updated as the most recent season ended today.

Please note the text in the template above, which reads "This template should be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, so that an editor unfamiliar with the subject matter could complete the requested edit immediately." --joe deckertalk to me 04:48, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
The article contains general information, but also historical and statistical data about the highest Polish football league, the Ekstraklasa. The 2011/2012 season, the most recent one, ended yesterday and therefore the data provided in the article are outdated. That's why I'm requesting an edit to bring this article up to date again. -- Adriano 7 11:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Wow, I'm pretty sure I just explained this. Let me try again.
I understand in general terms that that is what you would like. However, the template that you have used is used to attract the attention of random administrators to assist, not people who are specifically familiar with the topic. I'd have no idea where to start, and neither would most of the people you'll get in using this template.
If you would like to suggest a "complete and specific description of the request", that is, spelling out in every word and detail what change you'd like made, I (or another admin) will make it.
If you would simply like the article updated and aren't up to proposing the specific changes required, then say that here, but please don't use the {{Editprotected}} template until there is a proposed set of changes spelled out in every detail. It's not that we don't want to help, it's that we don't have enough information to help. Feel free to discuss this further at my talk page if you have further questions. Thanks! --joe deckertalk to me 19:19, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
By the way, I believe the protection on this article is about to expire. You may find that you can make the changes directly by the time you read this. --joe deckertalk to me 19:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Didn't Polonia win the championship twice? edit

'46 and '00, why it is not listed then (and 1up for Masovia then) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.58.207.166 (talk) 03:30, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Champion, not champions edit

Widzew Lodz is not a champion, they don't even play in ekstraklasa, it's only ONE champion, not multiple champions, for season 17/18 Legia Warsaw is a champion, Lelek 1313 (talk) 23:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

1921 championship for Cracovia edit

Cracovia had won the 1921 championship. That's why it has a silver star (for 5 championships).

Discrepancy in number of titles for Wisła Kraków edit

Both Ekstraklasa#Clubs_by_number_of_league_championships and Wisła Kraków's own page state 13 titles, but the listing above (Ekstraklasa#List_of_league_champions), shows the club with 14. Grunners (talk) 20:34, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Similarly, Ruch Chorzów has the same discrepancy but in reverse (13 on List of League Champions, but 14 on Club by number of league championships and their own article. Grunners (talk) 20:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)Reply