Talk:Egyptian Bloc

Egypt Mid‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

'to counter the brotherhood'? edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The bloc, according to the wiki article as it stands, is intended to counter the Muslim Brotherhood's new party. The source for this appears to be a journalistic piece by Al Arabiya. However, this contradicts the bloc's own statement, which it made during its opening conference. I think that section should be removed, or rephrased as speculation (which it is). || Moemin05 (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Statements of the Bloc itself (the article's subject) are not considered reliable sources. On the other hand, I see no reason why not to consider Al Arabiya a reliable source. Al Ahram agrees with the view as presented. Therefore I cannot see this analysis as speculation. If you find reliable, neutral sources that contradict, I will agree with rephrasing this statement. If you doubt the reliability of Al Arabiya, please bring this to the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Thank you for your understanding. --RJFF (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Egyptian Bloc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic