Talk:Eglu

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Industrial design Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Omlet Ltd was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2014 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Eglu. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Advertisement edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

isn't this an advertisement for one particular brand of chicken coop? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.128.206 (talk) 03:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It does read like an infomercial, and the coop does not appear to notable enough to warrant an article of its own. However, the references are solid and from very notable sources. So...I have no idea what to do about it --Nakerlund (talk) 00:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic