Talk:Edwin Cortes

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Sennecaster in topic Copyright problem removed

Updates edit

Added more information fleshing out the nature of the offenses, charges, and trial.Rococo1700 (talk) 03:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cortes was not arrested in 1980, if so that did not lead to conviction. he was not one of the Evanston 11. He was not convicted of sedition, but of seditious conspiracy. His conviction did not state that he tried to overthrow the government of United States in Puerto Rico. Seditious conspiracy involves levying war against the government of the United States. All his actions however were in the mainland, and not in Puerto Rico. I am not sure if he was placed in isolation due to his association with multiple breakout attempts.I doubt the validity of any statement that claims it was solely for political purposes.Rococo1700 (talk) 03:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sedition is not a charge per se, but an act; e.g., the American South executed sedition from the rest of the US, but the FALN only conspired to become separated. Seditious conspiracy refers to the planning the actions intended to achieve the sedition. When "sedition" is cited by itself in any source regarding FALN members, it should be interpreted as a shorthand for "seditious conspiracy" since, obviously, Puerto Rico never separated from the US. As to the 1980 arrest date, what makes you say he was arrested in a different year? Mercy11 (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sennecaster (talk) 05:40, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply