Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Astaggemeier.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:06, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unemployment rate edit

According to the CIA factbook, the Kosovo unemployment rate is 16.6% (2009 est.).

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/kv.html

There were two sources for unemployment rate of 40-50%.

"Unemployment remains pervasive, at around 40-50% of the labour force."

  • First source is obsolete.

http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/enlargement_papers/2005/elp26en.pdf

"The address you used has either changed or is obsolete"

  • Second source has older information comparing with the CIA factbook. It's from 2006.

http://www.eciks.org/english/lajme.php?action=total_news&main_id=386

"4.05.2006, May finds Kosovo with 50% unemployed"

Gaston28 (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply


2010 sources seem to report unemployment rates between 40 and 60 percent. The CIA Factbook itself as of October 2010 reports 40% unemployment in the prose of the "Economy" section. I believe the "2009 estimate" is a copy-paste error from when the Kosovo article was first created, taking over the value from Serbia for lack of a reliable value for Kosovo. The unemployment rate for Serbia is given by the CIA Factbook as "16.6% (October 2009 est.)" --dab (𒁳) 12:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I was going to make Dbachmann's point about the CIA factbook. I'm happy for the old sources to be discarded, if you want to; I left them in because it seemed arrogant to change virtually everything (although I think that is essentially what needs to happen in this article).

If one walks around Pristina and looks at the full cafe-bars everywhere it is very difficult to believe that the "true" unemployment rate is 40%. But where social security benefits are so low that one has to find some extra money in order to survive, it is very hard to define a "true" unemployment rate. The waiters in the cafe-bars may be informally employed, but does one count a Roma who washes windscreens at traffic lights as being in "informal (self-)employment? To be honest, I don't know. --Markd999 (talk) 17:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Structure of article edit

This needs a lot of work. The fact that a power company has a customer care centre does not have great importance for its economy. The fact that Porsches are sold in Kosovo (so are more or less every other sort of car, has even less. I suggest that editors look at IMF Staff Reports.--Markd999 (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply


Natural Resources edit

I propose to shorten this section, while keeping the sub-headings. Extraction of any minerals carries environmental costs, which of course are greater in densely populated areas. Even with the best possible technology available today, it is difficult to see how Kosovo could increase lignite-based electricity-generation without breaking the 20:20:20 EU-compatible climate change obligations. Moreover, mineral extraction typically generates relatively low employment and of course only a proportion of this profit goes to the state or local community. The value of minerals beneath Kosovo's surface (which may be much greater than stated in the article) may make Kosovars think that they are potentially rich, but this needs to be treated with some scepticism. The costs in human health terms (and to the economy, even if the state is not shouldering the costs directly) of pollution from the Trepca lead mines, the KEK plants at Obilic, Ferronikeli, and the Sharrchem cement factory at Hani i Elezit are certainly substantial; in richer areas of Europe the argument would not be whether to divide Mitrovica but whether to evacuate it. (Oddly enough, and it is a searing indictment on both capitalist and communist operators of Trepca, a far more environmentally friendly way of dealing with potential lead pollution was available even in 1804. The London Lead Company dealt with the problems of heavy metal poisoning in its mines in Northumberland by building a very large chimney. Since it could not build it six miles high, it built it six miles underground, with a normal chimney at the outlet. Most of the lead emitted crystallised in the chimney and was then collected) --Markd999 (talk) 20:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Economy of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Economy of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Road infrastructure in Serbia is less developed than in Kosovo? Really??? edit

Serbia has an adequate road infrastracture, while Kosovo's road network is horible! Serbia even has more kilometers of highways than Kosovo has paved roads, so I'm interested in how Serbian road infrastructure is less developed than Kosovo's???

And the second conclusion is just illogical - "... offers an alternative from the EU to the routes through Serbia or Montenegro". How on Earth do you imagine that someone from EU goes through Kosovo by avoiding going through Serbia or Montenegro? Do you even have a map??? You can go from Europe to Greece through Serbia-Macedonia, Romania-Bulgaria and Montenegro-Albania; you can go from Europe to Asia through Serbia-Macedonia-Greece, or Serbia-Bulgaria, or Romania-Bulgaria. Neither of this routes includes Kosovo, because Kosovo is on the European road periphery. So, how can Kosovo be alternative for any road transportation if all possible routes through Kosovo require massive detour from the main roads??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.72.56 (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Economy of Kosovo edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Economy of Kosovo's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ebrd":

  • From Drenas: "DFF - Ferronikeli". EBRD. 29 July 2019.
  • From Industry of Kosovo: "DFF - Ferronikeli". EBRD. 29 Jul 2019.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply