Talk:Easter Sunday Raid
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Easter Sunday Raid article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 5, 2012 and April 5, 2015. |
Edits edit
Edited some extremely poor grammar and spelling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.56.180.7 (talk) 20:27, 19th May 2008 (UTC)
Removed the statement that the continued existence of the British Eastern Fleet was the first Japanese disaster of the war. It can be argued that the parts left UNTOUCHED at Pearl Harbor (the carriers, submarines, and oil storage tanks) were the first Japanese disaster of the war. And yes, I realize Enterprise and the other flattops weren't present. And that it would be a while before the submarines got a stranglehold on Japanese shipping. I can accept the argument that the Eastern Fleet prevented, for the first time in the war, the Japanese fleet from achieving their goal, but IMO its existence was hardly a disaster for the Japanese. --WeeWillieWiki (talk) 01:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Stats missing edit
Hi Wikipedians, I noticed that the infobox is missing stats on opposed forces numbers and key units, ships on both sides, and casualties. Can anyone please help provide these? I do not have access to the sources cited and listed. Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 00:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Easter Sunday Raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927112028/http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67911 to http://www.awm.gov.au/histories/second_world_war/volume.asp?levelID=67911
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)