Talk:East Richmond Heights, California

---

Wondering how to edit this U.S. City Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Cities standards might help.

"Commerce" section doesn't belong here.

Please don't reinsert this section; all it says, essentially, is that there's no commerce in the place. That is not useful at all. +ILike2BeAnonymous 17:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, there is commerce, though not an abundance. There are only two schools in the community--your standard suggest that the education section should also be called into question, due to lack of abundance of educational institutions. Indeed, the entire community houses a mere few thousand individuals--does this suggest that the entire page should be removed?

I won't make a blanket statement about the value of the commerce section, but to me, it's just another piece of information that helps the reader understand more about the area, which I believe is the purpose of this page. What's more, it happily existed for nearly the year it has been since I first fleshed out this page. Perhaps others in the community can weigh in. 198.144.208.133 08:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Again; what that section says, in so many words, is that there is no siginficant commerce in this place. The presence of a dry cleaner and a corner market do not constitute significant commerce. Therefore, there's no reason for this section to exist, especially in an article that has zero hope of ever being anything but a stub. So far as its having been there for almost a year, I can show you lots of erroneous stuff in this so-called "encyclopedia" that's been there longer than that, making that a weak argument. +ILike2BeAnonymous 17:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Conflict over location of "Richmond View"

The claim that this place is "sometimes referred to as Richmond View" conflicts with the article on Talk:Mira Vista (Richmond View), Richmond, California, which implicity takes that name in its title. One or the other is wrong (unless that term applies to both, in which case these articles should probably be merged). +ILike2BeAnonymous 18:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The two areas are distinct (the East Richmond neighborhood referred to in the other article is located within the city of Richmond), so the articles should not be merged. The connection between the name "Richmond View" and East Richmond Heights is illustrated by current real estate listings (simply google for "Richmond View"--real estate listings located within the CDP will be revealed.) I know of no connection between the name "Richmond View" and any area located within the city of Richmond. My understanding is that it exclusively refers to East Richmond Heights. 198.144.208.133 08:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

We are comparing apples and oranges. First, we have two names: Richmond Heights (a neighborhood within the city limits of Richmond), and East Richmond Heights (an adjacent CDP that is outside the city limits of Richmond). But guess what? They are both perched on the same hill and there is no obvious visual break to separate the two areas, which I think could include anything east of Interstate 80 between San Pablo Avenue (Exit 16B) and San Pablo Dam Road (Exit 18). So I think both articles can claim to be referred to as either Richmond View or Mira Vista without being misleading. And no merging required, as the two articles refer to different features (a neighborhood, and a CDP). Highspeed (talk) 17:50, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Richmond Heights

• Map of Richmond Heights —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemanetwork (talk • contribs) 01:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Mail Delivery

Could someone please tell me the source for the statement about using Richmond or El Cerrito mailing addresses? Thank you. Onthegroove (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on East Richmond Heights, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)